New to the forums? Click here to read the "How To" Guide.

Developer? Click here to go to the Developer Forums.

Valve Index vs HP Reverb V2 - Which one is better? (Video & Text)

Shadowmask72Shadowmask72 Posts: 4,017 Valuable Player
edited September 2019 in General
Just finished this up. My rough and ready video review. Forget squeaky clean gaming spaces and fancy camera work this is raw-testing and non-scientific analysis. Not being paid by or influenced by anyone. Purchased both headsets with my own funds. For the record, this is the revised version of the HP Reverb, not the original release version. 



Valve Index vs HP Reverb


Before we start our look at the Valve Index vs HP Reverb let’s be clear that this is not going to be technical. We’re not going to break-down the specs and look at the finer details in any scientific way. Our comparison comes from using both headsets with the same PC, software and playing environment. Take a look at the video or read the transcript below.


Setting-Up


To kick things off this is where everyone has to start and to be frank the Reverb has the Index beat here. Once you plug in the single USB 3.0, the Display Port cable, then open the Windows Mixed Reality Portal, it’s plain sailing. A process which literally takes just a few minutes. Setting up a seated or roomscale play area is easy alongside controller tracking. All the initial prep work is completed in moments.

The Index on the other-hand requires a single or two base-stations mounted somewhere in the room to cover the play area (each requiring its own plug socket). Valve recommends they overlook the play-area using an elevated position. It’s not difficult, but depending on your environment you might need to secure them firmly or invest in a set of tripods. Once in place though, again connecting the single USB 3.0, display port and power supply isn’t tough. But, that is three plug sockets potentially. Booting up Steam VR and calibrating from that is pretty painless and quick. Overall though this is a longer process than the ease of inside out tracking.

Comfort


Both headsets have pros and cons in this area so perhaps a draw here. We won’t talk about the design aspects because frankly when you’re in VR what you look like from the outside has no bearing at all. Starting with the Index then and it’s a much heavier beast by far. The sturdy back strap and overall weight makes it one of the heavier VR headsets on the market. However, it’s very comfortable as a result. The design makes putting it on tightening the knob at the back and adjusting the screen-to-eye distance to suit very easy. A mechanical IPD adjustment also comes as a godsend for getting the right picture quality for your head-shape. With extended playing, the weight will impact comfort for some people. The design feels right for longer play sessions where the user can adjust the tightness without taking the headset off. Perhaps getting too sweaty might be a reason to call time though.

The Reverb comes in very light in comparison to the Index and does a grand job of reducing any light bleed from under the nose thanks to its rubber flaps. The Reverb looks designed for prolonged usage, however the inside cushioning and flaps presses against the face. You can mitigate the pressure slightly by loosening the straps. However, the straps aren’t as rigid or easy to find a preferred comfort zone like the Index. Therefore you will need a bit more fiddling to find the right fit. The cable though is quite heavy and pulls or rests on your shoulders. It’s a bit of a design thorn-in-the-side. Investing in a belt-clip could prove to be a good option to take some of the weight away. However when playing seated it’s a minor issue but noticeable all the same.

Display

Again, both headsets exhibit definitive pros and cons in this area so it’s hard to pinpoint an overall leader here. Both use the same LCD type displays which means black levels are on par. However, the brightness and colour gamut of the Index offers a greater vibrancy overall. The eyes get used to what is in front of them but using the two headsets side-by-side and it’s clear the Index offers the best overall colours.

Where the Reverb simply beats the Index hands-down with no room for any doubt is its higher resolution. Perhaps the biggest strength the Reverb has over any other VR headset at present. It’s a night-and-day difference in games like Fallout 4 VR. Any items viewed up-close that show fine detail look much better on the Reverb, take the weapons in Doom VFR for example. The cockpit display in PCARS 2 or anything that offers distance detail. Rather than a blur, objects look crisp and clear perhaps on par with a 2D monitor at times. Desktop use is also clearer on the Reverb making it quite viable for working this way.

However, there are drawbacks which manifest themselves in the Reverb which puts the Index back into contention. The Reverb’s screen area of high clarity is quite small which requires the user to look directly ahead at all times. You move your head to look at things rather than your eyes. Once you gaze away from this central area the image loses the really sharp clarity. This is very apparent when using things like Virtual Desktop. The Index on the other hand feels more uniform and has a wider area of focus made even better with the adjustable knob to move the lenses closer to the eyes. This has the added bonus of increasing the field of view which is wider and taller than the Reverb.

The dreaded Screen Door Effect feels quite similar on both headsets with the Reverb almost eliminating it entirely. However, when viewing bright colours on a dark background the Index suffers greatly from glare or god-rays which is distracting at times. The Reverb doesn’t have as much glare but does exhibit some minor ghosting when moving ones head at speed and slight chromatic aberration. Mura is visible as well in some instances on the Reverb.

The Index has another trick up its sleeve and is somewhat future proofing itself with its 120hz and 144hz low-persistence screens. Playing fast-moving games at these high refresh rates makes quite a difference and beats the competition which maxes out at 90hz. There is a GPU requirement to run at these high refresh rates but in less demanding games the differences are quite remarkable. Movements feel smoother and presence increased as a result.

Watching movies feels quite similar on both headsets until you view 4K content which puts the Reverb ahead slightly in terms of sharpness. You are very much at the mercy of the source material and in both headsets a 1080p video isn’t going to look as sharp as 4K. Again, the colour settings of the Index feels richer but if your video player has some fine-tuning adjustments then a bit of fiddling can make the differences less-pronounced.

Audio


When it comes to audio the Index excels with its off-ear solution compared to the pads of the Reverb. The sound quality is far richer on the Index with a decent range of low-to-high frequencies. Obviously not as good as an expensive pair of cans, but still good for VR playing. One drawback or benefit depending on the scenario is the off-ear design means you can hear what’s happening outside of VR. This is either distracting or better for feeling less isolated – take your pick. The cones move up and down easily to suit the head-shape. An option to connect your own headphones is available as well but this adds even more weight.

On the flip-side the Reverb pads offer great movement to suit head-shape but click when pulled out. It feels somewhat cheap though as if they could snap at any moment. The sound quality is functional with less frequency range than the Index. You would need to push them into your ears to feel better bass response which isn’t practical. Again, a plus or negative depending, they touch the ears which means you can feel detached from the outside which is great in certain games. Not so good if other people are in close-proximity.

Tracking & Controllers


The Index instantly wins hands-down in this area. The lighthouse tracking verses the two camera inside-out tracking of the Reverb makes it a no contest. Tracking on the Index is pretty flawless and with the right two basestation set-up, no occlusion at all. The Reverb loses tracking quite frequently where room conditions such as bright light or lack of it in the play space impacts performance. As mentioned, the 120hz or 144hz displays of the Index means tracking feels much smoother and immersive.

The Index knuckles controllers versus the rather functional WMR controllers again puts the Index ahead on another-level. The knuckles offer an ergonomic, comfortable fit by their design and feel great when throwing things such as grenades in Doom VFR. The WMR controllers whilst covering both bases by having a thumbstick and trackpad don’t have any regular A/B X/Y buttons which means a reliance on the trackpad for those functions. Certainly not as comfy to hold or use. A shame HP didn’t opt to redesign those for their headset. In the case of games such as PCARS 2 or Elite Dangerous, Xbox Gamepads or other peripherals come highly recommended.

Final Verdict

The Valve Index is a great headset, perhaps one of the best on the market right now. It mostly covers all bases for the VR connoisseur and comes with a high-price of entry to suit. Its richer colours, great audio and low-persistence screens make for very immersive VR experience especially at 120hz and above. However, it’s a bit of beast in weight and suffers from unsightly godrays.

For pure raw-power when it comes to clarity the HP Reverb is king here without a shadow-of-a-doubt. The crisp image means the negatives aren’t as impacting or very easily ignored. It’s a shame the controllers and tracking solution feels somewhat dated. A revision of the controllers and more cameras might have helped here. However, for specific use-cases such as sim playing or seated gaming/desktop work it’s not an issue.

To conclude then, the Index offers a concise all-round high quality VR experience across-the-board. The Reverb on the other hand provides a no-nonsense visual assault on the eyes in terms of high quality clarity at the expense of everything else. If we’re to choose one over the other then the Index feels more refined all-things-considered and comes recommended above the Reverb. However, for the moments you require ultra clear visuals and if that’s most important to you then the Reverb is a must, no other VR headset comes close as of now.


System Specs: RTX 2080 ti , i9 9900K CPU, 16 GB DDR 4 RAM, Win 10 64 Bit OS.

Comments

  • RuneSR2RuneSR2 Posts: 4,547 Valuable Player
    Great review, thanks!

    BTW, let's say a game like Fallout 4, have you tested the amount of ss you can add to each hmd before diving below 90 fps and then tried to compare image quality? Of course Reverb will still win, but maybe to a lesser degree?

    Is the Reverb cable same length as the Index?

    You could try Lone Echo - can the Reverb keep 90 fps in that game even using 2080 Ti and how about controls in that game?

    And is it possible to use Reverb + Knuckles?

    I do realize you may not have time to answer all these questions, this was just some brainstorming on my part.
    Intel i7 7700K (4.5 GHz); MSI GeForce GTX 1080 8GB Gaming X (oc 2100 MHz gpu boost, 11 GHz mem speed); 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 MHz; MSI Z270I Gaming Pro Carbon AC (VR-Ready) mainboard; Samsung 960 Evo M.2 SSD + Toshiba P300 HD; Windows 10 OS; Valve Index and Oculus Rift CV1 - the latter nearly always using super sampling 2.0. 

    "Ask not what VR can do for you – ask what you can do for VR"
  • RedRizlaRedRizla Posts: 6,926 Valuable Player
    edited September 2019
    @RuneSR2 - I'm playing fallout 4 with 114% Steam VR Super Sampling and getting a constant 90fps using a Geforce 2080ti. I just tried Alien isolation with 200% and was getting a constant 90fps. It's obviously going to depend on the game and how well optimized it is for VR, but I haven't had a problem with any game running smooth on the HP Reverb using a Geforce 2080ti. DCS is up and down but it's like that on most headsets.
    The cable is long enough for room scale and I've heard people have even extended it by a meter. The ridged cable and connector are a pain though if you are not seated, but I haven't gotten around to trying a belt clip and fastening the connector to the back of the headset. I just wish a company like Oculus, HTC or Valve gave us the option to purchase a VR headset with this resolution then I would have my dream headset for a good few years.
    I'm really happy with my purchase of the HP Reverb even though I'm just currently using it for seated experiences atm.

  • TomCgcmfcTomCgcmfc Posts: 1,730 Valuable Player
    Very good comparison mate.  Thanks for sharing this.  Unfortunately the Index is still not available in Australia and the Reverb is still WMR (which I will never go back to).  At least I now know what I am missing, lol!

    Custom built gaming desktop; i9 9900k (water cooled) oc to 5ghz, gtx 1080 ti (from my old AGA), 32 gb 3000hz ram, 1 tb ssd, 4 tb hdd.  Asus  ROG Maximus xi hero wifi mb, StarTech 4 port/4 controller sata powered usb3.0 pcie card, Asus VG248QE 1080p 144hz gaming monitor, Oculus Rift cv1 w/2x sensors, Vive Pro, Vive Cosmos, Vive Wireless.

  • LuciferousLuciferous Posts: 2,274 Valuable Player
    edited September 2019
    Yep great review, pretty much what I expected based on other review sources. I am saving my pennies.

    @TomCgcmfc when you get the index can you do an Index Versus Cosmos post.  Fight...fight...fight...
  • Shadowmask72Shadowmask72 Posts: 4,017 Valuable Player
    Thanks Rune, I don't own Lone Echo and already I have my SS set at 200% in Steam (was previously 150% but the update changed the res).  Not done any pushing tests. Apparently it is possible to use the Knuckles with Reverb using OpenVR but this is something I am unlikely to try at this moment until there are clear instructions of how to do so. 


    System Specs: RTX 2080 ti , i9 9900K CPU, 16 GB DDR 4 RAM, Win 10 64 Bit OS.
  • RuneSR2RuneSR2 Posts: 4,547 Valuable Player
    edited September 2019
    Maybe it's time for a small video - I guess most of you have played Lone Echo, but just in case someone hasn't - this video arrived a few weeks ago and I couldn't agree more:



    To this day I feel that Lone Echo is like 10 times better than my second best VR experience, nothing else comes even remotely close. In many ways I feel like Lone Echo is the only real VR game made, because it shows the close to full potential of VR.
    Thus running Lone Echo is of some importance, even though I've completed the game. Just running Index ss 100% is extremely demanding, and I doubt 2080 Ti can do that in 90 fps using msaa4x, and I even more doubt that Reverb can do it using no msaa or msaa2x - and the Reverb may furthermore be problematic due to the full Touch support in Lone Echo.

    The real test isn't if it can run Crysis, but if it can run Lone Echo ss 100% msaa4x 90+ fps, lol.
    Intel i7 7700K (4.5 GHz); MSI GeForce GTX 1080 8GB Gaming X (oc 2100 MHz gpu boost, 11 GHz mem speed); 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 MHz; MSI Z270I Gaming Pro Carbon AC (VR-Ready) mainboard; Samsung 960 Evo M.2 SSD + Toshiba P300 HD; Windows 10 OS; Valve Index and Oculus Rift CV1 - the latter nearly always using super sampling 2.0. 

    "Ask not what VR can do for you – ask what you can do for VR"
  • WildtWildt Posts: 2,159 Valuable Player
    edited September 2019
    Lone Echo looks great, and it's very immersive. But the actual tasks you have to perform gets old and repetitive way before the game ends imo.
    EDIT: Sorry for getting lured off topic :blush:
    PCVR: CV1 || 4 sensors || TPcast wireless adapter || MamutVR Gun stock V3
    PSVR: PS4 Pro || Move Controllers || Aim controller
    WMR: HP Reverb
  • RuneSR2RuneSR2 Posts: 4,547 Valuable Player
    Wildt said:
    Lone Echo looks great, and it's very immersive. But the actual tasks you have to perform gets old and repetitive way before the game ends imo.
    EDIT: Sorry for getting lured off topic :blush:
    No matter if you like Lone Echo or not, my point is more that being able to run the game (Revive or whatever) is a nice reference for evaluating a new HMD. Index actually can run Lone Echo, although it may require 2080 Ti or better for acceptable image quality (MSAA4 due to jaggies, no TAA due to massive blur), but it can also run Lone Echo because Knuckles can perfectly emulate Touch and base stations support 360 degrees play space and cause no occlusions. Being able to run Lone Echo isn't just about the HMD, but just as much about controllers - which is why being able to run Lone Echo may be a great way to judge new VR solutions. Or one of the best I can think of - might change my opinion if Valve releases something really great ... soon... 
    In short, can the Reverb ss 100% run Lone Echo? ;)
    Intel i7 7700K (4.5 GHz); MSI GeForce GTX 1080 8GB Gaming X (oc 2100 MHz gpu boost, 11 GHz mem speed); 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 MHz; MSI Z270I Gaming Pro Carbon AC (VR-Ready) mainboard; Samsung 960 Evo M.2 SSD + Toshiba P300 HD; Windows 10 OS; Valve Index and Oculus Rift CV1 - the latter nearly always using super sampling 2.0. 

    "Ask not what VR can do for you – ask what you can do for VR"
  • ZenbaneZenbane Posts: 14,853 Valuable Player
    Wildt said:
    Lone Echo looks great, and it's very immersive. But the actual tasks you have to perform gets old and repetitive way before the game ends imo.

    Agreed. Great game, but the repetition is alive and well. As is with most VR games (including SkyrimVR).

    @Shadowmask72. For me, this confirms that there is no real next gen (CV2) on the market. I'll continue saving my money.
    Are you a fan of the Myst games? Check out my Mod at http://www.mystrock.com/
    Catch me on Twitter: twitter.com/zenbane
  • TomCgcmfcTomCgcmfc Posts: 1,730 Valuable Player
    Zenbane said:

    @Shadowmask72. For me, this confirms that there is no real next gen (CV2) on the market. I'll continue saving my money.
    I agree, no real gen2 yet, just minor improvements.  I'm not expecting a significant improvement with my pre-ordered Vive Cosmos.  Just wanted to try something diff and I had a bit of spare cash laying around, lol!

    I think that most VR users will probably get a better bang for buck by improving their current PC systems.  If you are still using a gtx980 maybe it's time to go to something better?  I upper the ante on my PC recently and this has really improved my Rift cv1 experiences, esp. with sims.

    Custom built gaming desktop; i9 9900k (water cooled) oc to 5ghz, gtx 1080 ti (from my old AGA), 32 gb 3000hz ram, 1 tb ssd, 4 tb hdd.  Asus  ROG Maximus xi hero wifi mb, StarTech 4 port/4 controller sata powered usb3.0 pcie card, Asus VG248QE 1080p 144hz gaming monitor, Oculus Rift cv1 w/2x sensors, Vive Pro, Vive Cosmos, Vive Wireless.

  • RuneSR2RuneSR2 Posts: 4,547 Valuable Player
    edited September 2019
    TomCgcmfc said:
    Zenbane said:

    @Shadowmask72. For me, this confirms that there is no real next gen (CV2) on the market. I'll continue saving my money.
    I agree, no real gen2 yet, just minor improvements.  I'm not expecting a significant improvement with my pre-ordered Vive Cosmos.  Just wanted to try something diff and I had a bit of spare cash laying around, lol!

    I think that most VR users will probably get a better bang for buck by improving their current PC systems.  If you are still using a gtx980 maybe it's time to go to something better?  I upper the ante on my PC recently and this has really improved my Rift cv1 experiences, esp. with sims.
    Compared to CV1, Index is totally Gen2 (tried CV1 last night, there's absolutely no doubt in my mind), just wait and see what you think about Cosmos also when watching movies ;)

    Also just tried Fujii - even though I normally don't buy VR games available for the extremely low-poly Quest - but Fujii has full Index finger tracking. And full finger tracking works perfectly, pinky gets detected every time. Graphics weren't that bad, especially because I had no problems getting solid 90 fps when forcing ss 200 % on the Index. Expect extremely awesome image quality when using ss 200% on the Cosmos - way beyond what any Gen1 hmd can achieve - an image quality so great that I've been asking myself several times if I really need more. For now I don't think we need more HMDs, we need more awesome games and apps. 

    Intel i7 7700K (4.5 GHz); MSI GeForce GTX 1080 8GB Gaming X (oc 2100 MHz gpu boost, 11 GHz mem speed); 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 MHz; MSI Z270I Gaming Pro Carbon AC (VR-Ready) mainboard; Samsung 960 Evo M.2 SSD + Toshiba P300 HD; Windows 10 OS; Valve Index and Oculus Rift CV1 - the latter nearly always using super sampling 2.0. 

    "Ask not what VR can do for you – ask what you can do for VR"
  • TomCgcmfcTomCgcmfc Posts: 1,730 Valuable Player
    I hope I end up considering it gen 1.5, lol!  Actually I much prefer to watch movies and YouTube on my Go.

    Custom built gaming desktop; i9 9900k (water cooled) oc to 5ghz, gtx 1080 ti (from my old AGA), 32 gb 3000hz ram, 1 tb ssd, 4 tb hdd.  Asus  ROG Maximus xi hero wifi mb, StarTech 4 port/4 controller sata powered usb3.0 pcie card, Asus VG248QE 1080p 144hz gaming monitor, Oculus Rift cv1 w/2x sensors, Vive Pro, Vive Cosmos, Vive Wireless.

  • RuneSR2RuneSR2 Posts: 4,547 Valuable Player
    TomCgcmfc said:
    I hope I end up considering it gen 1.5, lol!  Actually I much prefer to watch movies and YouTube on my Go.
    I'd suspect Cosmos to be your Go killer, but of course you're more mobile using the Go... 
    Intel i7 7700K (4.5 GHz); MSI GeForce GTX 1080 8GB Gaming X (oc 2100 MHz gpu boost, 11 GHz mem speed); 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 MHz; MSI Z270I Gaming Pro Carbon AC (VR-Ready) mainboard; Samsung 960 Evo M.2 SSD + Toshiba P300 HD; Windows 10 OS; Valve Index and Oculus Rift CV1 - the latter nearly always using super sampling 2.0. 

    "Ask not what VR can do for you – ask what you can do for VR"
  • ZenbaneZenbane Posts: 14,853 Valuable Player
    edited September 2019
    TomCgcmfc said:
    Zenbane said:

    @Shadowmask72. For me, this confirms that there is no real next gen (CV2) on the market. I'll continue saving my money.
    I agree, no real gen2 yet, just minor improvements.  I'm not expecting a significant improvement with my pre-ordered Vive Cosmos. 

    The Vive Cosmos should be fun since it offers full 6DoF (unlike standard MobileVR headsets) and has improved controllers over the terrible Wands! This is the first Vive Headset that looks worthy of an investment (imo). I am interested in hearing your review. And please don't oversell it by calling it a "gen 2" lol

    This is why I love Shadow's reviews. He has tried just about every single headset (even Pimax and Odyssey), and he keeps things honest and practical.
    Are you a fan of the Myst games? Check out my Mod at http://www.mystrock.com/
    Catch me on Twitter: twitter.com/zenbane
  • rednekcowboy77rednekcowboy77 Posts: 168
    Art3mis
    I have an issue with the Reverb, especially at it's price point, with the poor tracking though.  If tracking is an issue, then it makes the headset pretty much unusable for anything other than a sit-down vr experience.

    At it's price-point, I would expect a flawless experience.
  • RedRizlaRedRizla Posts: 6,926 Valuable Player
    edited September 2019
    I have an issue with the Reverb, especially at it's price point, with the poor tracking though.  If tracking is an issue, then it makes the headset pretty much unusable for anything other than a sit-down vr experience.

    At it's price-point, I would expect a flawless experience.
    Well if Oculus or HTC produced a higher resolution VR headset, then they would get my money and not HP. Unfortunately they are not producing higher resolution VR headsets though, so I don't really have a choice atm. Anyways, I've been playing games without too much of problem on the HP Reverb, but like you say they are only seated. I haven't really tried standing yet, but it's mainly the silly cable they chose more then it is just having the 2 camera's.
  • rednekcowboy77rednekcowboy77 Posts: 168
    Art3mis
    RedRizla said:
    I have an issue with the Reverb, especially at it's price point, with the poor tracking though.  If tracking is an issue, then it makes the headset pretty much unusable for anything other than a sit-down vr experience.

    At it's price-point, I would expect a flawless experience.
    Well if Oculus or HTC produced a higher resolution VR headset, then they would get my money and not HP. Unfortunately they are not producing higher resolution VR headsets though, so I don't really have a choice atm. Anyways, I've been playing games without too much of problem on the HP Reverb, but you you say they are seated. I haven't really tried standing yet, but it's mainly the silly cable they chose more then it is just having the 2 camera's.
    I am sure it works fine seated and for most people.  I don't use my vr for seated games (seems counter-intuitive for me--I purchased VR for an immersive solution.  I don't really understand why someone would play a game in VR sitting on their behinds but that is just me lol).

    To be perfectly honest, I didn't even look at the HP headset until I saw this post and saw a plethora of users having tracking issues.  Higher res means nothing to me if what I am playing is basically unplayable because the tracking sucks.  At least that is one thing Oculus got right with the Rift-S--I have 0 tracking issues.
  • RedRizlaRedRizla Posts: 6,926 Valuable Player
    edited September 2019
    RedRizla said:
    I have an issue with the Reverb, especially at it's price point, with the poor tracking though.  If tracking is an issue, then it makes the headset pretty much unusable for anything other than a sit-down vr experience.

    At it's price-point, I would expect a flawless experience.
    Well if Oculus or HTC produced a higher resolution VR headset, then they would get my money and not HP. Unfortunately they are not producing higher resolution VR headsets though, so I don't really have a choice atm. Anyways, I've been playing games without too much of problem on the HP Reverb, but you you say they are seated. I haven't really tried standing yet, but it's mainly the silly cable they chose more then it is just having the 2 camera's.
    I am sure it works fine seated and for most people.  I don't use my vr for seated games (seems counter-intuitive for me--I purchased VR for an immersive solution.  I don't really understand why someone would play a game in VR sitting on their behinds but that is just me lol).

    To be perfectly honest, I didn't even look at the HP headset until I saw this post and saw a plethora of users having tracking issues.  Higher res means nothing to me if what I am playing is basically unplayable because the tracking sucks.  At least that is one thing Oculus got right with the Rift-S--I have 0 tracking issues.
    The seated experience is good, but you can quite easily get by with the tracking standing up. The 2 side camera's on other headsets allow them to track the controllers at the side of you, but I haven't played that many games that require me to have my hands at the side of my headset for too long. Lots of people play Onward and things using WMR, so I'm not sure where you are getting it's unplayable from.
    Resolution would mean something to you if you took a look in my headset and compared it to your headset. It's like trying to tell someone to live without glasses once you see the HP Reverb display. I do wish Oculus or HTC would cater for people with higher end Graphics cards, but they don't and I just have to get used to that.



  • RuneSR2RuneSR2 Posts: 4,547 Valuable Player
    RedRizla said:
    RedRizla said:
    I have an issue with the Reverb, especially at it's price point, with the poor tracking though.  If tracking is an issue, then it makes the headset pretty much unusable for anything other than a sit-down vr experience.

    At it's price-point, I would expect a flawless experience.
    Well if Oculus or HTC produced a higher resolution VR headset, then they would get my money and not HP. Unfortunately they are not producing higher resolution VR headsets though, so I don't really have a choice atm. Anyways, I've been playing games without too much of problem on the HP Reverb, but you you say they are seated. I haven't really tried standing yet, but it's mainly the silly cable they chose more then it is just having the 2 camera's.
    I am sure it works fine seated and for most people.  I don't use my vr for seated games (seems counter-intuitive for me--I purchased VR for an immersive solution.  I don't really understand why someone would play a game in VR sitting on their behinds but that is just me lol).

    To be perfectly honest, I didn't even look at the HP headset until I saw this post and saw a plethora of users having tracking issues.  Higher res means nothing to me if what I am playing is basically unplayable because the tracking sucks.  At least that is one thing Oculus got right with the Rift-S--I have 0 tracking issues.
    The seated experience is good, but you can quite easily get by with the tracking standing up. The 2 side camera's on other headsets allow them to track the controllers at the side of you, but I haven't played that many games that require me to have my hands at the side of my headset for too long. Lots of people play Onward and things using WMR, so I'm not sure where you are getting it's unplayable from.
    Resolution would mean something to you if you took a look in my headset and compared it to your headset. It's like trying to tell someone to live without glasses once you see the HP Reverb display. I do wish Oculus or HTC would cater for people with higher end Graphics cards, but they don't and I just have to get used to that.



    Not that I'm particularly fond of WMR, but it's a fact that very few games and apps support the finger movement that Touch and especially Knuckles are capable of. Currently the most popular VR games seem to be Beat Saber, Trover and Moss (all have 96% ratings in the Oculus Store), and these games do not support any kind of finger tracking - although ordinary controller tracking may be challenged in Beat Saber - but I have not tried it. Most games where you hold a gun or sword may be fine too, unless some occlusion occur. I think Pyroth309 was/is happy for the O+, so even if WMR may have the worst tracking, it seems to work relatively fine in many games.  I like the Knuckles due to these controllers' ability to perfectly emulate Touch and because of their other advanced features, like full finger tracking and pressure sensitivity, but it's a luxury in many games. 
    Intel i7 7700K (4.5 GHz); MSI GeForce GTX 1080 8GB Gaming X (oc 2100 MHz gpu boost, 11 GHz mem speed); 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 MHz; MSI Z270I Gaming Pro Carbon AC (VR-Ready) mainboard; Samsung 960 Evo M.2 SSD + Toshiba P300 HD; Windows 10 OS; Valve Index and Oculus Rift CV1 - the latter nearly always using super sampling 2.0. 

    "Ask not what VR can do for you – ask what you can do for VR"
  • RedRizlaRedRizla Posts: 6,926 Valuable Player
    Has anyone who's got a HP Reverb found a way to make the cable a bit more comfortable when playing a game standing? I've cable tied the connector to the back of the headset and that works great when seated, but is there anything I can do to make it better whilst standing? Something like clipping it to a belt or something?
  • snowdogsnowdog Posts: 7,281 Valuable Player
    RuneSR2 said:
    RedRizla said:
    RedRizla said:
    I have an issue with the Reverb, especially at it's price point, with the poor tracking though.  If tracking is an issue, then it makes the headset pretty much unusable for anything other than a sit-down vr experience.

    At it's price-point, I would expect a flawless experience.
    Well if Oculus or HTC produced a higher resolution VR headset, then they would get my money and not HP. Unfortunately they are not producing higher resolution VR headsets though, so I don't really have a choice atm. Anyways, I've been playing games without too much of problem on the HP Reverb, but you you say they are seated. I haven't really tried standing yet, but it's mainly the silly cable they chose more then it is just having the 2 camera's.
    I am sure it works fine seated and for most people.  I don't use my vr for seated games (seems counter-intuitive for me--I purchased VR for an immersive solution.  I don't really understand why someone would play a game in VR sitting on their behinds but that is just me lol).

    To be perfectly honest, I didn't even look at the HP headset until I saw this post and saw a plethora of users having tracking issues.  Higher res means nothing to me if what I am playing is basically unplayable because the tracking sucks.  At least that is one thing Oculus got right with the Rift-S--I have 0 tracking issues.
    The seated experience is good, but you can quite easily get by with the tracking standing up. The 2 side camera's on other headsets allow them to track the controllers at the side of you, but I haven't played that many games that require me to have my hands at the side of my headset for too long. Lots of people play Onward and things using WMR, so I'm not sure where you are getting it's unplayable from.
    Resolution would mean something to you if you took a look in my headset and compared it to your headset. It's like trying to tell someone to live without glasses once you see the HP Reverb display. I do wish Oculus or HTC would cater for people with higher end Graphics cards, but they don't and I just have to get used to that.



    Not that I'm particularly fond of WMR, but it's a fact that very few games and apps support the finger movement that Touch and especially Knuckles are capable of. Currently the most popular VR games seem to be Beat Saber, Trover and Moss (all have 96% ratings in the Oculus Store), and these games do not support any kind of finger tracking - although ordinary controller tracking may be challenged in Beat Saber - but I have not tried it. Most games where you hold a gun or sword may be fine too, unless some occlusion occur. I think Pyroth309 was/is happy for the O+, so even if WMR may have the worst tracking, it seems to work relatively fine in many games.  I like the Knuckles due to these controllers' ability to perfectly emulate Touch and because of their other advanced features, like full finger tracking and pressure sensitivity, but it's a luxury in many games. 

    Mine will do. If I ever get it finished. Thumb up for reading thumb print on a scanner and pointing finger to flick switches.

    The tracking for the ring finger and the pinky finger is pretty useless though, which is precisely why, I suspect, that Oculus didn't bother with them.
    "This you have to understand. There's only one way to hurt a man who's lost everything. Give him back something broken."

    Thomas Covenant, Unbeliever
  • ohgrantohgrant Posts: 278
    Nexus 6
     Very nice review. I don't seem to be having tracking issues with the WMR controllers, but a few things that annoy me about them is in Fallout 4 VR it takes some fiddling to get the track pad to respond when I'm trying to cycle though the menu items on my pip boy. The other thing is the battery consumption. I only have a few hours a day to play and I've already had to replace the two AAA cells  Four AAA cells in one week is a bit much. I'm overall very happy with my Reverb though.
     I haven't tried it yet, but there is a way to use Vive controllers with WMR headsets by using the Vive or Index as a USB dongle, unplugging the HDMI or DP and adding one line to the Steam VR config file. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbDHuEkvqZc&t=5s  I'm going to try it when I get a chance to remove the wireless adapter and reinstall the original. 
     If I can get it to work, I'll probably get the knuckles controllers
    Gigabyte  AB350 Ryzen 2700x, 16gb ddr 4 3200, 1080ti. Z800 HMD, DK1, DK2, CV1, Vive wireless, Quest, HP Reverb. Viewsonic 1080p 3D projector ASUS 3D vision monitor.  UAD Apollo interface, Yamaha studio monitors.  
Sign In or Register to comment.