02-11-2016 01:07 PM
02-15-2016 06:14 AM
By far the most convincing 3D I've ever seen was at an IMAX seminar some years ago where they played some CGI 3D shorts rendered at IMAX resolution. The screen was big enough to almost completely fill the field of view, there were very few jaggies, and the CGI had some very deep compositions that emphasized the 3D effects.
02-15-2016 07:32 AM
"crim3" wrote:
Paradoxically, the screen is not even specifically 3D because it isn't doing any fancy trick to display passive or active 3d video output.
02-15-2016 11:20 AM
"Saffron" wrote:"crim3" wrote:
Paradoxically, the screen is not even specifically 3D because it isn't doing any fancy trick to display passive or active 3d video output.
Both HMDs and 3D TVs uses fancy tricks to get the user to experiment a false 3D sensation, that's why both of them have problems. 3D TVs has to share the same screen space for each eye while HMDs have it separated and use lenses, and both need a custom rendering process. But in the end of the day there's no real 3D screens (maybe curved tvs? :lol: ), only screens that are able to simulate 3D.
02-16-2016 12:14 AM
02-16-2016 04:28 AM
02-16-2016 06:49 AM
"crim3" wrote:
They use lenses because the panel is a few cm from your eyes.
02-19-2016 04:19 AM
"Saffron" wrote:I mean, they use lenses because the panels are a few cm from your eyes, not because they are flat.
and use lenses because they still use flat panels
02-19-2016 04:25 AM