04-08-2016 02:13 AM
04-08-2016 02:54 PM
04-08-2016 03:27 PM
04-08-2016 05:48 PM
jaimi said:
From someone who has a DK1, DK2 and a CV1, I have to say I am not underwhelmed at all with the CV1. I'm really happy with the resolution of the new CV1. There was a *lot* of wasted pixels in the DK1/DK2 screens because of the lenses, and the single screen. Moving to the dual screen and fresnel lenses allow them to utilize much more of the screen, and they're higher resolution. The overall effect feels much greater than simply comparing screen resolutions, because it uses the screen real-estate better. Is it perfect? No, it's not. But it's pretty close.
Purely pulling numbers out of the air, and using my purely subjective opinion, This is what the resolutions felt like to me. The DK1 felt like it was about 320x200. Yeah, it was really blocky. The DK2 did better - it felt somewhere between there and 640x400. Almost, but not quite. The CV1? Finally starts to look Hi-def. I know the resolution is higher, but it *feels* like a 720p experience. That's fine by me. I understand if you're a perfectionist, that's not good enough. For me, it's great .
04-08-2016 07:40 PM
cmfockler said:
I do agree that the unit gets a little warm after an hour or so and I think a lightweight cooling fan would have been a nice addition.
04-08-2016 11:20 PM
04-09-2016 12:54 AM
04-09-2016 01:26 AM
04-09-2016 03:50 AM
04-09-2016 05:55 AM
SickleFoot said:
This thread makes me sad.
04-09-2016 06:37 AM