05-18-2016 05:41 AM
OK after reading so many opinions on the lens technology used in CV1 compared to the DK2, I thought it would be interesting to poll everyone's opinion.
From my own experiences, the non-Fresnel lenses of the DK2 had more chromatic aberrations and a smaller sweet-spot but of course had no light rays. Everyone has their own opinion and so I'm curious to know where the overall preference lies.
I'm also curious to know how the opinions that are voiced in the forum effects those who haven't yet received their Rifts and if there is a gap between owners opinions and prospective owners opinions, because of reading the reviews. So thanks for your votes!
05-18-2016 09:19 PM
05-19-2016 02:05 AM
05-19-2016 02:51 AM
05-19-2016 04:36 AM
Thoemse said:
New option: I had a DK2, a CV1 and a Vive and I prefer the Vive Fresnel lenses.
05-19-2016 04:44 AM
05-19-2016 05:00 AM
06-02-2016 11:23 AM
06-02-2016 11:29 AM
I agree @bo3b, that's why we should just be comparing lens technology, I don't think this comes down to lens expense, unless you know for sure the lenses of the DK2 were cheap. As for the screens, yes ignore resolution and screen door... this is really just a comparison or chromatic aberration and sweet spot which at the moment is all we know about the two lens technologies advantages and disadvantages.
06-02-2016 02:30 PM
06-02-2016 05:12 PM