Hi,
ma rift does not work. The screen stays black and the LED yellow.
I have to admit that my specs are very low: A GTX 580 and an I7 860 CPU.
But can this be really the reason that the CV1 does not work ?
To my technical understanding this makes no sense.
It’s like saying “Well, this computer is too slow so no wonder the monitor
shows no picture.”
The GTX 580 supports HDMI 1.4a, this is above the demand of HDMI 1.3 by the
rift. The same applies to the maximum resolution of the GTX 580 of 2560 x 1600
vs. the specs of the CV1 (2160 x 1200).
Whether the system if fast enough for sufficient frame rates is a
completely different question. But it is at least capable to show a
screen.
I am not going to buy a completely new computer system just to realize that
this was not the problem. This is not less a matter of money than a matter of
time and effort.
I am planning to buy a new graphics card but have not yet decided which one
to buy. And if the oculus still does not work with the new graphics card the the support will probably tell me “It’s the CPU”.
Unfortunately I have no idea at the moment where to find a computer meeting
the specs to test this out.
But the “the display does not work because the computer is too slow” just
makes no sense to me at all.
What is your opinion / experience ?
Greets
Sam
Comments
Hook a Rift up to a appropriate PC and barring a bad HMD, it will work. Not sure why you're confused.
If you do wish to take this non-recommended path, your PC must at least meet the absolute minimum requirements:
Remember: The Rift will not run on your laptop, this rule does not change!
It's not the Rift, it's your computer.
I was also told this by others, but I've yet to run into a game that even nauseates me, much less doesn't run smooth enough to play. This is including EVERYTHING free on home, as well as windlands/dreadhalls/Elite Dangerous/War Thunder/Project: Cars/and many many more. So it's not really pointless to own a rift with this weak rig, ofc it won't be as good as a 1080 but it's great to have a blast in vr while I wait for my 1060.
Incorrect. It's set as a minimum to give "the best" experience when rifting, I'm far below spec and no issues at all.
If you have less than a 970 /290, You won't maintain 90fps, will have to lower settings when available and you can forget using the debug tool to increase render target. Not ideal.
So why change a running system ?
Of course I would upgrade the hardware, if, due to the higher resolution of the CV1, the would be any problems, but not yet.
And as the CV1 does not display anything, there is no chance to test it out.
readdeath: Well, I use the newest nvidia graphic driver, but indeed it is possible that the part that is responsible for the 580 has not been updated for months/years. That are internals I do not know anything about.
It seems no one fully read my earlier post, gpu and cpu were both stated lol.
Thats it exactly. But it's a nice brick. Ithink it's made of coal.
That's one hell of a stocking stuffer if it is coal. XD
For someone who disregards half of what is said so it sounds better when he argues makes your claim of me "not knowing any better" laughable at best. Yes, elitist with a comprehension (albeit seemingly so by choice) issue.
Grow up. Move on. Drop it.
Do you honestly think that these statements don't apply to you as well?
1) Can't make his XBox controller work
https://forums.oculus.com/community/discussion/comment/424140/#Comment_424140
Note that others have provided solutions while he was busy trolling.
2) He has no idea how to remove a simple Rift piece:
https://forums.oculus.com/community/discussion/comment/422734/#Comment_422734
Note the hilarious instructions given to him.
3) HMD audio/video issues
https://forums.oculus.com/community/discussion/comment/422715/#Comment_422715
4) Embarrassingly struggling with VR Porn:
https://forums.oculus.com/community/discussion/comment/422684/#Comment_422684
5) Opened a support ticket for lens help:
https://forums.oculus.com/community/discussion/40853/red-tint-under-vertain-conditions-and-support-asking-for-a-picture-of-it
He couldn't take a pic to show his problem, and actually used Paint to illustrate it lol - and please look at the extra large crayola style art job he did. If that's any indication of his PC skills and abilities:
I repeat, a guy who uses Paint is insulting forum members and moderators because they didn't build their own VR Ready machine, and ridiculing random forum posters if they don't readily understand the things he's made sure he understands (for the sole purpose of ridiculing the lack of understanding in others).
Hilarious.
Catch me on Twitter: twitter.com/zenbane
Catch me on Twitter: twitter.com/zenbane
For nVidia it's GTX 650 or better and newer. I don't know if you actually read my minimum specs or not, and I don't want to be disrespectful but you even say that the specs I said are the absolute minimum are actually recommended ones. I don't agree with you.
And is still fairly comparable to the r9 270 I'm using.
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-R9-270-vs-GeForce-GTX-580#performance
That being said if there's some sort of hidden restriction being that nothing less than the gtx 650 will even display, regardless of actual gpu muscle. Then yes I would be incorrect, and he has no choice but to upgrade gpu's. I was countering that if it's straight muscle, then the 580 should still at the very least display an image (even if it has some judder; as asynchronous timewarp can be a miracle worker for underpowered rigs). And it might be a quite common issue of incompatible usb drivers (or not enough power in them) or possibly him using a incompatible dvi >hdmi adapter or some variant therein. Regardless, he should definitely save up for new hardware upgrades, even if it is possible to run the rift on his rig.
Also I didn't say it was the recommended spec as those are obviously not a 970/290, I was saying it was the minimum required to run it and should still be possible to actually run it (albeit with loss of performance) with something a touch weaker.
Catch me on Twitter: twitter.com/zenbane