10-31-2018 12:18 PM
11-01-2018 04:35 AM
kevinw729 said:
I have to wonder how much of this is an an attempt by "Mr.MeeSeeks in Sandals" to try and control the narrative with the leaking of the Rift S direction by Oculus (if proven to be true).
With the departure of fellow founder, and the rolling back of a lot of the previous issues they were directly responsible for, and fought so hard to defend, just claiming that everything wont work - seems more like a "...if you had done it my way, it would be cool" statement!
I just wonder if Facebook would have been so happy to invest considerably more that $2b into a scheme that is now claiming "No existing or imminent VR hardware is good enough to go truly mainstream...!"
11-01-2018 09:32 AM
11-01-2018 09:58 AM
11-01-2018 10:03 AM
przecinek said:
This article is meant for broad audience not just VR enthusiasts like us.
Palmer did and said a lot of things that hurt the image of VR and the brand of Oculus. This forum exists because consumers who are VR Enthusiasts have helped make this a viable business venture.
11-01-2018 10:07 AM
11-01-2018 10:31 AM
bigmike20vt said:
Regardless of whether PL is right or wrong, I cant help that feel these kinds of comments are somewhat biting the hand which fed him.
11-01-2018 03:50 PM
Oh how the table has turned!
No I don't know where you can find that table but for some reason I want it in my life.
11-02-2018 01:12 AM
11-02-2018 02:32 AM
Zenbane said:
Regarding this part of the claim:"You could give a Rift+PC to every single person in the developed world
for free, and the vast majority would cease to use it in a matter of
weeks or months."Does Palmer plan to back this up at all? It's easy to say it, much less easy to prove it.
11-02-2018 04:31 AM
logotomie said:
The biggest thread to VR right now is the idea that there is just one small hurdle to take for getting VR ready for significant adoption.