03-29-2019 04:26 PM
06-07-2019 05:22 AM
06-07-2019 06:38 AM
Oculus Rift CV1, Valve Index & PSVR2, Asus Strix OC RTX™ 3090, i9-10900K (5.3Ghz), 32GB 3200MHz, 16TB SSD
"Ask not what VR can do for you, but what you can do for VR"
06-07-2019 08:09 AM
Luciferous said:
Whether @ParadoxAnomaly is Atmos or not @Techy111 he has been well behaved in this thread at least. However some have constantly attacked and tried to goad him into arguments.If you decide to ban him then that is of course up to you but until then, people should be warned for attacking him after every comment. Personally I am a great believer in redemption.
06-07-2019 08:13 AM
Zenbane said:
Luciferous said:
I would also say the rules should apply to people who have attached at least 4 people in this thread.Using the word "attack" simply because you disagree with an opinion is a bit silly. But if you really feel attacked, then instead of derailing the thread, just send a PM to the Mods. There's a process for that stuff. So far, you have been the most consistent poster in this thread who derails by abandoning the topic entirely and making things personal.Here's a good example of a personal attack you launched:
https://forums.oculusvr.com/community/discussion/comment/682480/#Comment_682480
06-07-2019 08:16 AM
06-07-2019 08:31 AM
@ParadoxAnomoly have you asked yourself how we figured out that you're Atmos so quickly?
And as to the comment on believing in redemption @Luciferous that's a noble thought but in the case of Atmos, he was singularly damaging to this forum. Not owning or using an Oculus headset (sorry DK2 over 3 years ago doesn't count)but posting a combination of 100% anti-Oculus posts/pro non-Oculus posts within a forum set up for Oculus users is eventually bound to be considered baiting/trolling.
This behaviour clearly hasn't changed and has even earned him a ban on another forum which is set up for all VR users irrespective of manufacture and in turn has caused in increase in posts here again.
A ban here should mean ban.
06-07-2019 08:39 AM
06-07-2019 08:45 AM
It can't be proven so on that basis there never will be a ban.
It took 3 years of constant low level baiting with occasional blatant rule braking to eventually result in a ban here. If it takes another 3 years to end up in the same conclusion again, then be prepared for 3 years of the kind of old arguments that you're objecting to.
06-07-2019 08:52 AM
06-07-2019 08:56 AM