01-29-2020 02:32 AM
02-10-2020 01:59 AM
LuluViBritannia said:
(On a side note, your point did come through. But people who run on high-specs usually don't understand what we're talking about since, well, they're not on low-specs, xD)
02-10-2020 02:13 AM
Comic_Book_Guy said:
Umpa_PC said
I think you will find it takes a lot of extra power to produce not a lot of extra visuals (as you should already know). The whole point is that your 'baseline' is good enough for most people and should be reflected in the advertised specs IMO. Otherwise it just goes to re-enforce the idea that VR is only for the rich, or people who have their money priorities wrong.
I mean...what ever helps you sleep at night. I'm not sure you understand medium settings vs high settings, or what super sampling does. Lighting, shadows, draw distance, environmental detail......ya, those all matter to a lot of people. You may be satisfied with what you got, great, but what I don't understand is why this is hard for you. Your last sentence is a particular head scratcher. They specifically have reduced quality settings available for people like you who can seemingly barely afford VR. That's precisely what it's for, to get more people in the door. Here you are asking why. It makes no sense.
And contrary to what you think I should " probably know", higher settings and super sampling is in fact a " a lot of extra visuals" generally, vs what you're experiencing. Sorry, it just is. Do you wish it wasn't so? Are you jealous? upset about it? I seriously don't understand your mindset.
02-10-2020 02:32 AM
02-10-2020 02:46 AM
To play The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners you will
need a minimum CPU equivalent to an Intel Core i5-4590. Whereas, an
Intel Core i7-8700K is recommended in order to run it. In terms of game
file size, you will need at least 40 GB of free disk space available.
The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners system requirements state that
you will need at least 8 GB of RAM. If possible, make sure your have 16
GB of RAM in order to run The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners to its
full potential. The cheapest graphics card you can play it on is an AMD
Radeon RX 480. Furthermore, an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is recommended in
order to run The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners with the highest
settings.
02-10-2020 03:12 AM
bigmike20vt said:
wow you do seem rather agressive to people you disagree with.... Your question has been quite logically answered, that you dont like the answer is no reason to accuse people of not understanding.Obviously games makers want to sell to as many people as possible, BUT poorly performing VR can (and does) make people physically sick. That you have a higher tolerance or that games run acceptably for you is fantastic but it makes perfect sense, esp in an industry where developers are still somewhat learning their trade to play it safe..... best underpromise and over deliver than vice versa.if you as a user choose to push it, then that pushes the responsibility onto you if you buy a game and it affects you badly.think of it like this.... a submarine may be rated to a max depth of 500m (total guess I am no seaman)... That does NOT mean IF you go to 600m you will definitely get crushed and die, but just because you manage to do it and survive does not automatically mean the sub should be re-rated to 600m 😉
02-10-2020 03:32 AM
Umpa_PC said:
I totally agree with you all except the part about me being aggressive and the submarine analogy - because I am in that submarine and all is OK and you are comparing apples and oranges., Please don't misunderstand me trying to spell it out when I think someone doesn't understand or won't take on board.
I don't mind that people disagree with me, but to be fair if you read back some people have gone off on a tangent and tried to make this all about me more or less saying high end graphics cards are a waste of money - and thats not what I have said at all. One idiot tried to make it about me not being able to afford a higher end card (what a jerk). There are one or two obtuse replies, don't hate the guy for telling it how it is!
I notice you have not posted your computer specs, so can only assume, you have a high end graphics card, and have not played the game on a low end card, thus might not have any real experience on what I am trying to say.
Did you read the entire thread before posting ?
02-10-2020 03:49 AM
02-19-2020 11:35 AM
Umpa_PC said:
Comic_Book_Guy said:
Umpa_PC said
I think you will find it takes a lot of extra power to produce not a lot of extra visuals (as you should already know). The whole point is that your 'baseline' is good enough for most people and should be reflected in the advertised specs IMO. Otherwise it just goes to re-enforce the idea that VR is only for the rich, or people who have their money priorities wrong.
I mean...what ever helps you sleep at night. I'm not sure you understand medium settings vs high settings, or what super sampling does. Lighting, shadows, draw distance, environmental detail......ya, those all matter to a lot of people. You may be satisfied with what you got, great, but what I don't understand is why this is hard for you. Your last sentence is a particular head scratcher. They specifically have reduced quality settings available for people like you who can seemingly barely afford VR. That's precisely what it's for, to get more people in the door. Here you are asking why. It makes no sense.
And contrary to what you think I should " probably know", higher settings and super sampling is in fact a " a lot of extra visuals" generally, vs what you're experiencing. Sorry, it just is. Do you wish it wasn't so? Are you jealous? upset about it? I seriously don't understand your mindset.
None of this has anything to do with the topic, Perhaps English is not your first language ? or simply obtuse ??
02-19-2020 11:50 AM