09-03-2014 06:57 AM
09-09-2014 05:57 AM
"saviornt" wrote:
Quantum entanglement does in fact transfer information faster than the speed of light, but not in the traditional sense. It's... complicated. However, we are a long time away from mastering it, and you start running into things such as "grandfather paradoxes" by having information travelling in such a way. Physics at the quantum scale does not follow physics at the "massive" scale, hence why Einstein called quantum physics "spooky".
Once we become a class 2 civilization, we will need to have quantum entangled communications, however, as I said, we are quite some time from it. The best we can achieve with current technology is fiber/light based communications.
In regards to having sub 5ms ping times to Google, a ping request is only 4-16 bytes in length, whereas, a 1920x1080p image (uncompressed) is roughly 36 million bytes.
09-09-2014 04:26 PM
"saviornt" wrote:
Quantum entanglement does in fact transfer information faster than the speed of light, but not in the traditional sense. It's... complicated. However, we are a long time away from mastering it, and you start running into things such as "grandfather paradoxes" by having information travelling in such a way. Physics at the quantum scale does not follow physics at the "massive" scale, hence why Einstein called quantum physics "spooky".
Once we become a class 2 civilization, we will need to have quantum entangled communications, however, as I said, we are quite some time from it. The best we can achieve with current technology is fiber/light based communications.
In regards to having sub 5ms ping times to Google, a ping request is only 4-16 bytes in length, whereas, a 1920x1080p image (uncompressed) is roughly 36 million bytes.
09-09-2014 06:28 PM
09-09-2014 08:33 PM
09-10-2014 12:13 AM
09-11-2014 10:01 AM