cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

VR Porn (MEGATHREAD) NSFW

Herolord
Level 4
"Pokey" wrote:
Theriftlist lists 3D Porn Director:

http://theriftlist.com/Home/Game?name=Porn%20Director%203D

The problem with that is that most people don't want to have relations with a texture. They would have to use 3d scans as displayed in a previous thread.
1,353 REPLIES 1,353

spire8989
Level 3
"HappyHimitsu" wrote:
"IsoMacintosh" wrote:
i have played some japanese porn games and noticed one part that needs improvent. the cumshots.
Do modern computers have enough power to do the cumshots using realistic fluid simulation? i have not seen anyone do it.
also can you even do simulated fluids in udk?
if someone has examples of simulating small amounts of fluids, id be interested.


Do you think you could try to be a little less 'juvenile' in your terms? Something a little more mature such as 'money shot' instead of your choice words would go a long ways in keeping the discussion from degrading into something offensive to those other people browsing these pages.
Their are many different people reading these forums and I would think we would want to keep the appeal as open as possible if we would like to continue such topics here, rather than be banished to speak about them in some dark corner of the internet.
Thanks.

Now as for the realistic fluid simulation matter. I don't think it is an issue of whether or not it could be done, but whether or not it would be worth the developers investment to incorporate such a thing when I think that most people would not really care one way or another.
I'm sure it would have it's place though and I could be wrong, but that would be my best guess anyhow.


You're okay with money shot and not cumshot? Grow up.

jwilkins
Level 2
Would it be possible for everybody to agree that if you respond to this thread that you contribute something? I've tried to follow that rule, since I don't want the thread derailed, but people can't seem to resist getting side-tracked.

I was looking at this Japanese demo (there doesn't seem to be a real game here) and while I was first tempted to write it off as yet another bad breast spring simulation, there seems to be some improvement here.




Mainly, there does not seem to be as much self-intersection as I'd expect to see.

I think the main challenge here is the fact that breasts do not have a uniform density and the elasticity of skin is not a linear function. Without these factors we go into the uncanny valley. Maybe that is the wrong term since I can't say I've ever been creeped out by breast simulations.. Uncanny Boobys? 😉
(╯°□°)╯︵┻━┻

usb420
Level 2
something like a make-out or lap dance simulator with those anime graphics
would definitely be cool.

IsoMacintosh
Level 3
"jwilkins" wrote:
I was looking at this Japanese demo (there doesn't seem to be a real game here)

uh, it clearly says its from "Oppai slider 2" its an older illusion title from 2005.

EDIT: Actually the reason i brought the cumshots up, was that i have played illusions newest game "Premium Play Darkness" and that game has really bad cumshots.

jwilkins
Level 2
I know the title, but didn't think it was important enough to mention. I trust people can follow up on things if they want. I have not looked at it, but people seemed to say there wasn't anything interesting about it other than than the sliders (hence, no real game). I am surprised it was 2005 because this is about is good as anything I've seen except for one other simulation that I haven't been able to find again.

I've been interested in breast rigs because, like the fluid simulations brought up earlier, there are solutions that get close to the ground truth but we don't have the computational power. The real time solutions don't really cut it. What I find funny about the idea of doing seminal fluid simulation is that you might actually get away with publishing a paper on it and nobody would guess what your purpose was, but if you tried to obfuscate your real time breast rig research you'd probably have people giggling anyway. :lol:
(╯°□°)╯︵┻━┻

IsoMacintosh
Level 3
"JohnRambo" wrote:
What a coincidence! I just read on the news that Priya Rai will be travelling to India and making her first Bollywood movie, and that it was also be India's first 4D movie. Awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!

What is 4D though?

4d movie is just a 3d movie with physical effects.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4D_film
but i thought that her movie was not porn, so this is offtopic.

Edit: Corrected a language mistake (finnish language has no he/she only "hän")

AnotherAtreyu
Level 4
"spire8989" wrote:

You're okay with money shot and not cumshot? Grow up.


I never said I wasn't ok with the term, what I want in regards to respecting other on this forum matters little; I said that many other people read these forums and that perhaps if we wanted to keep this thread available it would be best to keep the terminology as mature as possible.
If you can't understand that reasoning and you feel the need to disrespect another's opinion because of your intrepid nescience, I don't think I really care much about what your feelings regarding the issue is either.

If you can't help yourself but be puerile when dealing with an 'adult' topic then I would assume you are either still a teenager, suffering from some form of mental disorder, or just ignorant.

The difference between 'money shot' and your more uncouth terminology is like the difference between 'breasts' and 'tit*ies' (apologies to anyone who deems this offensive, I am just using it to make a descriptive point) and while you may not care about whether one sounds right to your ears or not, it may be deemed as offensive to others.

I am certain that as the rules of the forum become more clear and pronounced you will find what I have said to be quite relevant.
“If you are willing to look at another person’s behavior toward you as a reflection of the state of their relationship with themselves rather than a statement about your value as a person, then you will, over a period of time cease to react at all.” (~I really gotta remember this shiz~) ― Yogi Bhajan

IsoMacintosh
Level 3
"HappyHimitsu" wrote:
I never said I wasn't ok with the term, what I want in regards to respecting other on this forum matters little; I said that many other people read these forums and that perhaps if we wanted to keep this thread available it would be best to keep the terminology as mature as possible.
If you can't understand that reasoning and you feel the need to disrespect another's opinion because of your intrepid nescience, I don't think I really care much about what your feelings regarding the issue is either.

People get offended, thats life.
if we were considering oversensitive people then this thread would not exist.

"HappyHimitsu" wrote:
If you can't help yourself but be puerile when dealing with an 'adult' topic then I would assume you are either still a teenager, suffering from some form of mental disorder, or just ignorant.

Oh, and telling people that they have mental problems is of course not offensive. :roll:

"HappyHimitsu" wrote:
I am certain that as the rules of the forum become more clear and pronounced you will find what I have said to be quite relevant.

Ok until then GTFO 😄

kojack
Volunteer Moderator
Volunteer Moderator
"JohnRambo" wrote:
"kojack" wrote:
"JohnRambo" wrote:
Do you guys know what kind of camera technology would be required in order to film a porn star and then render it into a 3D environment? I need an answer to that question fast, as I have approached one porn star with the idea of filming her in 3D and her agent has replied to me and told me he would discuss it with her.

It would depend on the budget and quality required.
The lowest end of the scale would be a kinect using the kinectfusion app (which generates detailed polygon models of 3d space) to build a 3d model. I was able to make an ok 3d model of my head (the hair went strange, but the face was ok) just by holding the kinect at arm's length and orbiting it around, then applied a photo texture to it in Maya. At the very least it would give a base model for an artist to clean up in zbrush or other modelling tool.

Then rig it and do some motion capture to control the model (could use the kinect again, but will require manual animation cleaning up too).

Edit: unless you mean just recording in 3d using stereo cameras then compositing into a 3d scene, that would be a lot easier. Either get two good cameras or a single camera with a 3d lens splitter.


"Edit: unless you mean just recording in 3d using stereo cameras then compositing into a 3d scene, that would be a lot easier. Either get two good cameras or a single camera with a 3d lens splitter."

Yes, that is what I am looking to do. Create a real life porn program. Not some animated thing. So what kind of camera technology would be required for that? Stereo cameras, or a camera with a 3D lens splitter?


I had a post here: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=646#p6251
that shows a 3d splitting addon for a camera. It lets a camera like a canon dslr (only crop sensor models, not full frame like the 5d, 6d or 1d) take photos or record video in side by side stereo. The addon can also take fisheye lenses, so you could basically get a single camera that records video in roughly oculus compatible side by side with distortion (should have higher image quality in the middle than doing the distortion in software).
However, I've never tried it (I have a crop sensor camera that would be compatible, but it has no video ability). So maybe it won't look good on the rift.

The advantage to getting two cameras is that you'd get higher resolution in the recorded video (such as full 1920x1080 per eye instead of shared between both eyes horizontally). But you'd need to make or buy a stereo rig to hold them, make sure they are calibrated, it would be heavier, more expensive. Focus and zoom would be a complete pain if you couldn't control them simultaneously. Would work though. I've bought 3 cheap preowned PS Eye cameras ($17 for 3), I intend to try using 2 as stereo for the rift (due to their crazy high fps), the third is to hack around with making it IR only. I'll get a fourth for that too (stereo IR) if I can find another one, they've been discontinued.


At the end of last year a few of my students (college level) wanted to do breast simulation as the final assignment in the 3d maths subject, because I taught them soft bodied physics simulation. 🙂
Nobody ended up doing it though.
Author: Oculus Monitor,  Auto Oculus Touch,  Forum Dark Mode, Phantom Touch Remover,  X-Plane Fixer
Hardware: Threadripper 1950x, MSI Gaming Trio 2080TI, Asrock X399 Taich
Headsets: Wrap 1200VR, DK1, DK2, CV1, Rift-S, GearVR, Go, Quest, Quest 2, Reverb G2

flyingwaffle
Level 2
It lets a camera like a canon dslr (only crop sensor models, not full frame like the 5d, 6d or 1d) take photos or record video in side by side stereo. The addon can also take fisheye lenses, so you could basically get a single camera that records video in roughly oculus compatible side by side with distortion (should have higher image quality in the middle than doing the distortion in software).


The big issue is that no matter how you record 3D stereo video/photo, you will lose the capability to support head tracking, i.e. either the image is 3D and the point of view is fixed, or the image is 360 degree, but it's 2D.
I tried to think of a 3D image format to support looking around (i.e. all the orientations supported by the Rift, including tilt) in a 360 view, so that you'd feel like really being in the middle of a scene... but it's not obvious.

In a first approximation, taking a combination of a 2D 360 image (easy) plus a corresponding 360 degree depth buffer (hard), from a central point. You could then dynamically create a view for each eye for any orientation of the head, but because of parallax you'd have often missing pixels that you would need to fill in (maybe by repeating this from a few points).
An easier approach might be taking lots of 3D stereo images from many angles around a central point, and then interpolate them.